【Watch Fast Five Online】

Twitter is Watch Fast Five Onlinetesting a new feature that could fundamentally change the nature of the platform.

On Wednesday, Twitter announced that it would test new controls that would allow a user to select, tweet by tweet, who could respond to their post.

Who's invited to your party? Credit: Twitter

With a new permissions button that appears in the bottom left corner of a tweet, users will be able to choose whether they want any Joe Schmo to be able to reply (currently the norm, and the default going forward), whether "people you follow" can reply, or whether "only people you mention" can weigh in.

A "small" percentage of users have received the test, and Twitter didn't say whether it will be rolling out more widely in the future.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

For the past few years, Twitter has been studying and testing various ways to improve "conversational health" on the platform. That's a fancy term for cutting down on trolling.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Twitter doesn't explicitly connect the test to that initiative. But in a blog post announcing the feature, it says that "we're exploring how we can improve these settings to give people more opportunities to weigh in while still giving people control over the conversations they start." The blog post references "reply guys" when it explains that "unwanted replies make it hard to have meaningful conversations."

If a person does come across a tweet they're not allowed to respond to, the reply button will be grayed out. If a person tries to reply, a pop-up will explain what's going on.

You're not invited. Credit: twitter

Being a place where anyone can weigh in on any conversation (unless your account is private) is a double-edged sword. It can lead to connections and creativity, and so many funny memes. But it also has enabled harassment and toxicity.

Twitter users might be upset about the power this gives "blue check marks" (people with verified accounts) to make conversations closed and elitist, especially if they use that "people I'm following" setting. Some users, like Lil Nas X, are already joking about their exclusive tweets.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.

Jokes aside, the settings could also be a useful way to facilitate conversations with experts, or free tweeters to share opinions with less fear. Plus, the "everyone" reply setting is still the default, and anyone can still "Retweet with comment." Twitter just made it easier to follow "retweets with comments," too.

The move to rein in a nasty reply thread is not totally unprecedented. In November 2019, Twitter gave users the ability to hide replies to their tweets from specific users.

There is a lot to test with the new feature. Will it change Twitter too much? If so, how angry will people get? And will Twitter roll it out to everyone?That's up to Dorsey and co. to decide.

Topics Social Media X/Twitter

• Life
• Games
• Deals
• Social Good
• Digital Culture
• Tech
• Science
• Shopping

• In the House of a Thousand Likes
• Leaked images reveal Samsung's Galaxy Watch Active 2 smartwatch
• Porn site Clips4Sale names pegging as 2023 fetish of the year
• Beto O’Rourke gives furious response to question about Trump’s impact on mass shootings
• The Professional Friends of YouTube
• AOC calls out Mitch McConnell for pic of his supporters groping a cutout of her
• Elon Musk temporarily shuts down Twitter Spaces
• This video of 2 cow friends reuniting is extremely moo
• Administering Evil
• Data breach leaks personal information of tens of thousands of college students

• Terry Winters by Yevgeniya Traps
• Barack Obama slips on his mask after eulogizing John Lewis, and this shouldn't even be a story
• The History of English in Ten Minutes, Dystopian Dream Books, and Other News
• "An Egoless Practice": Tantric Art by Lauren O'Neill
• Fair Game by Sadie Stein
• Walk Like Updike, Live Like Lowell, Eat Your Words by Sadie Stein
• Hemingway Hotels, Customized Austen, Literary Shame by Sadie Stein
• TikTok says it's not going anywhere after Trump promised a ban
• The Rescue by John Banville
• YouTube channel perfectly ruins perfectly good songs

• Nanny State of Mind
• Las Vegas is facing a grasshopper invasion of Biblical proportions
• Why we turn off autocaps and only write in lowercase online
• Watch a loose bat fly around a Spirit Airlines plane mid
• Juneteenth, From Atlanta to Oakland
• 7 times Apple surprised us (for better or worse) in 2022
• Las Vegas is facing a grasshopper invasion of Biblical proportions
• Watch a loose bat fly around a Spirit Airlines plane mid
• Brand on the Run
• This is what it's like when a covert image of you goes viral online

• Labor History in Real Time
• 'King of Random' YouTube star Grant Thompson dies at age 38
• Meghan Markle's 'Vogue' video is basically a who's who of empowering women
• 10 best video games you may have missed in 2022
• LittleSis is Watching the One Percent
• The 20 best podcasts of 2022
• Here are the 8 best gadgets of 2022
• Jake Paul and Tana Mongeau's wedding was absolute, glorious chaos
• The Sad Song of Privilege
• Viral memo written by Google employee alleges pregnancy discrimination