You might think it's cute to snap a photo of your toddler running around in a playground or Watch A Wife Who Lost Her Chastity To A Friend Episode Full HD Onlinehaving a temper tantrum, and then posting it on social media.
But did you ever think it might be a mistake, or even illegal?
The French government earlier this year warned parentsto stop posting images of their children on social media networks.
Under France's rigorous privacy laws, parents could face penalties of up to a year in prison and a fine of €45,000 ($46,456) if convicted of publicising intimate details of their children without their consent.
This new legality is powerful food for thought for parenting in the Facebook era.
SEE ALSO: 5 ways to safeguard your privacy on InstagramAs adults, we often express dissatisfaction at the ways young people post their lives online. But if we turn the mirror on ourselves, do we as parents actually have the right to make our family photos public? If so, which ones?
Part of the issue is our tendency for over-sharing. A recent studyby Nominet, which handles the UK's .uk domain name registry, found that parents post nearly 200 photos of their under fives online every year.
This means that a child will feature in around 1,000 online photos before their fifth birthday. We've even got to the point where if you don't upload photos of your baby, others question whether you are a committed parent.
This new norm means that many children will have a powerful digital identity created by someone else. This process can be likened to the manufacturing of celebrity identities, where parents can potentially shape the public persona of their child in any way they want: Child genius, disobedient, fashionista, fussy eater and so on.
How do you think your own mum or dad might shape your online identity? Do you think it would be an accurate portrayal of who you are? There is also the issue of Likes and comments on those photos. Without realising it, are we choosing to upload posts about our kids that we hope will get the most audience attention? If so, how is this skewing the identity we are shaping for them?
We often tell our kids that once something is on the internet it is there forever, and this is a core concern for kids. Researchshows that parents often haven't considered the potential reach and the longevity of the digital information that they're sharing about their child.
Your child won’t have much control over where that home video of her having an embarrassing first singing lesson ends up or who sees it.
And for this generation of kids, the publicising of their lives can start even before they are born when parents broadcast photos to all their friends and their friends' friends of the antenatal scan.
Parents' actions are generally not maliciously intended. In fact, they actually often see they are exposing something personal about their own life in such posts rather than that of their child.
The answer of how to approach this new-found issue might be to listen to what kids have to say about it.
There's also benefit from such sharing. Posts about your child bed-wetting might help a friend find solutions, or boost their patience for dealing with a similar issue with their own child. Many parents find this community of support important.
Given the relative youth of social media, it's hard to say exactly how growing up online could affect children's privacy, safety and security. But social media has also been around long enough now (Facebook is now 14 years old) that it's important to seriously consider the issue.
It’s time to question how individuals (both children and adults) should manage boundaries around sharing personal information, and how they can control information that is shared about them.
Posting embarrassing photos of others on Facebook without consent is definitely tricky territory, but what constitutes embarrassing is slightly different for everyone, which makes this new issue even more of a minefield.
The answer of how to approach this new-found issue might be to listen to what kids have to say about it.
Recent researchfrom the University of Michigan asked children and parents to describe the rules they thought families should follow related to technology.
Adults tend to think of these rules around how much time kids spend on screen, but about three times more children than parents thought there should be rules about what parents share and don't share on social media. Many kids said parents should not post anything about them on online without asking them.
Both children and parents considered positive images, events and news more appropriate to share than negative ones. An image of the child playing on the swings at the park is a lot less likely to resurface than a YouTube video of them having a tantrum because their breakfast is not in their favourite bowl.
If you're a parent looking for advice or sympathy about a behavioural problem, then a community approach is still very helpful, just don't post an image and your child’s name as part of the post. This will help to limit the searchability and reach of it.
Asking your children's consent is also part of the issue and part of the solution. Asking if your child likes the photos of them and whether you can put it up online can be a very quick and respectful conversation. It also sets up a great approach to your kids understanding digital etiquette.
Parents sharing photos of their kids online isn't only about digital identity. It's also about our obsession with taking photos of our kids, particularly when they shine (or don’t shine) in their respective activities.
This can make kids feel pressured to perform to help mum and dad get the right snap to share. What the children really want to see is you taking notice of them and acknowledging that they and their actions are important.
Topics Cybersecurity Facebook Privacy Social Media
Reading the Artifacts After the Capitol Riot by Swati RanaEverybody’s Breaking Somebody’s Heart by Drew BratcherA Masterpiece of DisharmonyA Little Patch of Something by Imani PerryCakes and AleThe Art of Distance No. 37 by The Paris ReviewOn Jean Valentine by Hafizah GeterA Collision with the Divine by Helen MacdonaldWhat Our Contributors Are Reading This Fall by The Paris ReviewLost Libraries by Rosa LysterThe Art of Distance No. 36 by The Paris ReviewThe Art of Distance No. 38 by The Paris ReviewFreedom Came in Cycles by Pamela SneedFuck the Bread. The Bread Is Over. by Sabrina Orah MarkLoneliness Is Other People by Katharine SmythTokyo Reeks of Gasoline by Yi SangMy Cephalopod Year by Aimee NezhukumatathilThe Cold Blood of Iceland by Roni HornTokyo Reeks of Gasoline by Yi SangLiterary Paper Dolls: Clarissa by Julia Berick and Jenny Kroik These new little Tasmanian devil joeys are as clingy as human babies Pornhub just banned Texas. Here's why. Wordle today: The answer and hints for March 14 Wasp named after Lucius Malfoy just needs your love and understanding Best pet deal: Save 20% on select items at Fable Pets How to get the 2024 NCAA Tournament basketball printable bracket CHP sends stern message to drone operators near California wildfires Microsoft Copilot: Free tier gets AI upgrade to GPT Best Nintendo Switch deal: Get a Nintendo Switch for $276.99 plus $25 in Amazon credit Best gaming laptop deal: the Acer Chromebook 516 GE is on sale for a record Carbon dioxide in the air is skyrocketing to record levels, U.N. warns It's like ChatGPT with a body: Watch creepy demo of OpenAI 'Apples Never Fall' review: Can this Liane Moriarty show top 'Big Little Lies?' BeReal has 10 months left before it runs out of money How to take a screenshot on Chromebook Google is training an AI to play video games — why this could be problematic SpaceX just stuck another rocket landing at sea, this time before dawn 'You'll Never Find Me' review: A tense cat Marshall speaker sale: Get up to 45% off at Amazon Climate change costs in the U.S. are mounting, watchdog warns Congress
2.5484s , 8226.0390625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Watch A Wife Who Lost Her Chastity To A Friend Episode Full HD Online】,Pursuit Information Network