Some AI-generated videos will now require a label20p ArchivesYouTube
The policy was first announcedby the company last November, but according to a new update from YouTubeposted on Monday, the new policy and its required compliance tools are now being launched, and will continue to roll out over the coming weeks.
"We’re introducing a new tool in Creator Studio requiring creators to disclose to viewers when realistic content – content a viewer could easily mistake for a real person, place, or event – is made with altered or synthetic media, including generative AI," says YouTube.
YouTube is requiring that creators mark certain AI video content so the platform can affix an "altered or synthetic content" label on it. However, not all AI video content will need to be labeled.
According to YouTube, this policy only covers AI digital alterations or renderings of a realistic person, footage of real events or places, or complete generation of a realistic looking scene.
YouTube also explains what type of AI-generated content is exempt. For the most part, these exemptions are minor alterations that were possible well before the generative AI boom of recent years. These include videos that use beauty filters, special effects like blur or a vintage overlay, or color correction.
There is one interesting and glaring exemption from YouTube's new AI-labeling policy: Animated AI-content.
According to YouTube, animated content is "clearly unrealistic" so it does not need to be labeled. The policy is meant to curb misinformation or potential legal issues which could arise from generated versions of real people. It is not meant to be quality control, warning users when low-effort AI generated junk starts playing on their screen.
However, as Wiredpoints out, YouTube is arguably dropping the ball here because the policy leaves out the bulk of kids content, animated video.
Disturbing kids videos on YouTube have made headlines over the years and the company has made movesto deal with the problem. Often these appear to be pumped out as quickly as possible without any educational intent or even steps to ensure age-appropriateness.
Kid-oriented content on YouTube will be affected by this policy if creators push misinformation, because that would fall under the "realistic" portion of these new rules. However, bulk-generated AI animated junk, usually aimed at the youngest demographics, will not. And it seems YouTube is missing out on an opportunity to have this type of content labeled so parents can easily filter it out.
All-in-all, YouTube's new AI policy is a step in the right direction. Generative AI that could be misconstrued as real will be labeled, and uses of AI by filmmakers and creators to enhance high-quality content won't be affected.
Still, it doesn't appear that YouTube is yet dealing with the potential for low-quality, AI-generated content to fill the site and fundamentally change the platform. It may be forced to confront that reality, though, when and if it arises.
Topics Artificial Intelligence YouTube
These are the online dating emoji your love life desperately needsInternet divided over who to blame for teen's death over Snapchat stuntRaspberry Pi Zero W includes WiWhat will the new presidential administration change about online payments?What will the new presidential administration change about online payments?If Steve Jobs was still alive he'd totally be wearing this 3Raspberry Pi Zero W includes WiChance the RapperProminent GamerGate target details disturbing harassment, all these years laterRedux tech turns the smartphone screen into a speaker'Get Out' finally got a negative review and it's from exactly who you'd expectHere's what it was like being on stage during that unbelievable Oscars mixI sat in Peugeot's Instinct concept car and it told me to relaxiPad artist turns his side hustle into official NBA artUnlikely animal friendship blossoms when a carriageEngineer alleges culture of sexism and discrimination at TeslaState Department tweets then deletes congratulations to OscarTwitch will let streamers sell games, raising loads of ethical questionsWhy Kellyanne Conway was on the couch and oh lord this is so dumbMoon phase today explained: What the moon will look like on June 24, 2025 The Worst Thing for Writing Is Envy Things People Do: Four Paintings by Mernet Larsen Why Does the First Person Come First? Mondays Have Always Been Blue—Even Before the Pseudoscience Translating Tranströmer: An Interview with Patty Crane Win a Free Copy of John O’Hara’s “Pal Joey” Ted Hughes in “The Fouled Nest of the Industrial Revolution” Queen Bitch: Alex Abramovich on David Bowie Forman Brown and Albert Einstein’s Marionette The Mr. Mantarian Subterfuge: A Story of Dog Boarding Photography Incubabula: How Early Photographs Got in Books Cure Your Loneliness. Do the Twist. Staff Picks: Peter Hujar, Luc Sante, Samantha Hunt A New Year’s Recommendation: The Score to “Thief of Bagdad” Linda Pastan Talks About Her New Collection, “Insomnia” Writing Advice from S. J. Perelman Isak Dinesen’s Art Is as Good as Her Writing Hiroki Tsukuda’s “Enter the O”: A Haunting Alternate Reality Pink Cigarettes: Notes on Lighting Up Doddering Old Men: On Henry de Montherlant’s “The Bachelors”
2.1252s , 10122.046875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【720p Archives】,Pursuit Information Network