Lies are the eroticization of genderbad. But a little fewer lies are...a little less bad?
On Thursday, Facebook announced it would not change its controversial policy of allowing political ads to contain lies. Instead, the company will give its users the option to see fewer political ads, as well as give them a little more control over which ads they see, and which they don't see.
The changes are coming via an update to Facebook's Ad Library, a tool that lets anyone see all the ads that politicians run on Facebook and Instagram. Starting sometime in the first quarter of 2020, when the changes are scheduled to roll out, users will be able to:
See the estimated target size for each political, electoral, or social issue ad.
Search the Ad Library more precisely, for example by exact phrases or with filters that include audience size as well as dates and regions reached with a particular campaign.
Control which ads reach (or don't reach) them based on Custom Audience lists. Custom Audiences are lists of user information that help advertisers target ads, and users will be able to fine-tune their ad-seeing experience by hiding ads based on an advertiser's Custom Audience list, or make themselves eligible to see an ad that an advertiser otherwise wouldn't show. This change is coming "later this month."
Choose to see fewer political and social issue ads.
The new controls are nice (and will hopefully prompt more users to use the Ad Library, which hasn't been very useful in the past), but Facebook's blog post announcing the change, signed by director of product management Rob Leathern, essentially repeats Facebook's stance towards political ads, which can contain lies.
It raised the ire of outgoing Federal Election Commission chair Ellen Weintraub who called the plan "weak" and "window-dressing."
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Massachusetts Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren perhaps illustrated the issue best when she ran an ad campaign on Facebook with false claims.
SEE ALSO: Facebook revamps 'privacy checkup' to help manage data settingsTwitter recently stopped running political ads altogether, precisely for this reason, and Google somewhat limited political ads without explicitly banning them. But Facebook is taking a different route.
According to Leathern, Facebook considered taking a similar approach as Google, but ultimately gave up, due to "the importance of these tools for reaching key audiences from a wide range of NGOs, non-profits, political groups and campaigns, including both Republican and Democrat committees in the U.S."
Facebook's stance is that political ads should be regulated by law, but until they are, all Facebook thinks it should do is make sure the ads abide by the company's Community Standards which ban hate speech, harmful content and ads that intimidate potential voters into not voting.
"Ultimately, we don’t think decisions about political ads should be made by private companies, which is why we are arguing for regulation that would apply across the industry," he wrote. "We (...) will continue to work with regulators and policy makers in our ongoing efforts to help protect elections.
UPDATE: Jan. 9, 2020, 11:16 a.m. EST Updated to include comment from FEC commissioner Ellen Weintraub
Topics Facebook Social Media
'Tinder for elites' is coming to London because dating isn't already hard enoughAaron Sorkin is just now discovering there's a diversity problem in HollywoodFrom Buzzfeed to Watcher, how Ryan Bergara built a career on ghostsUm why is there a teddy bear emoji on these leaked Samsung Galaxy S8 camera photos?6 things about adulthood that 'Kenan & Kel' did not adequately prepare me for13 feminists who play the Twitter game to winMost Anticipated PC Games of 2025Uber's self'Star Wars Rebels' finale: Watch Thrawn throw downAfter United Airlines incident, women share stories of being shamed for their clothingTrumpcare might be gone but the internet is memeing it to death just in case'Star Wars Rebels' finale: Watch Thrawn throw downMelissa McCarthy reveals how her perfect Sean Spicer impression came into beingYou soon won't need a card to withdraw cash at this shady bank's ATMsSean Hannity is so very sad that Ted Koppel thinks he's bad for America13 feminists who play the Twitter game to winSean Hannity is so very sad that Ted Koppel thinks he's bad for America15 great excuses to not go out tonightThese hilarious memes have taken over the Indian internet'Pretty Little Liars' series finale will have a 'huge twist' TikTok's gas smelling trend questions what happened to gas's strong smell The best pets of 2022 (so far) Elena Ferrante‘s Children’s Book Is Being Translated and It Sounds Terrifying Little Man of Nuremberg: Wonder in the Age of Matthias Buchinger 'The Fall of the House of Usher': Every sibling is named for a Poe character David Szalay Wins Plimpton Prize; Chris Bachelder Wins Southern Prize No Stranger to Excess: Terry Southern on The Paris Review Offices Alert: Mr. Darcy’s Dripping Wet Shirt Is Coming to the USA Whiting Awards 2016: Ocean Vuong, Poetry Who is Vecna in 'Stranger Things' and why is the internet talking about them? Listen to James Baldwin Read from “Another Country” The Rediscovered Prison Memoir of a Black Man in the 1850s Whiting Awards 2016: Safiya Sinclair, Poetry TikTok trend reminds people to be kinder to themselves Join Our Editor, Lorin Stein, for Two Events in Paris Whiting Awards 2016: Brian Blanchfield, Nonfiction Whiting Awards 2016: Catherine Lacey, Fiction At Last, We Answer Patricia Lockwood's Excellent Tweet Whiting Awards 2016: J. D. Daniels, nonfiction This Disturbing 1936 Cartoon Tells Springtime’s Origin Story
1.2446s , 8286.3515625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【the eroticization of gender】,Pursuit Information Network