Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【batille eroticism】

Source：Pursuit Information Network Editor：Social Good Time：2025-06-26 19:59:11

Sometimes,batille eroticism it's OK to do the dishonorable thing. Even when the game you're playing is literally called: For Honor.

If you've been keeping up with Ubisoft's just-released "knights vs. samurai vs. vikings" melee combat game -- particularly the conversations going on in its subreddit -- you might have noticed a debate brewing. One camp thinks it's cool for two people to gang up on a solo warrior; the other camp refuses, calling such a move dishonorable.

SEE ALSO: 15 years later, 'For Honor' has gone from losing pitch to winning game

Some explanation is in order. There are several different PvP modes in For Honor. The marquee "Dominion" mode is like a no-guns take on Call of Duty's Domination, with two teams of four vying for control of three capture points. A 1v1 duel mode is exactly what it sounds like: two players face off in a best-of-five match.

Alongside those is a 2v2 mode, and that's what the debate is primarily focused on. There are no respawns in 2v2, so if your partner dies before taking out a member of the other team, you're stuck fighting two people.

The "fight honorably!" camp believes the team with superior numbers should let the match play out in 1v1 engagements. So if you kill one opponent, it's fine to let your partner fight the remaining opponent, but you shouldn't wade in unless your partner falls.

The other camp embraces the opposite viewpoint: if you manage to beat one member of the other team, you should definitely find your partner and gang up on the survivor.

Mashable Top Stories Stay connected with the hottest stories of the day and the latest entertainment news. Sign up for Mashable's Top Stories newsletter By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

There's no right or wrong here. If you think it's more honorable to let your teammate finish off the battle, that's fine. You just have to accept that other teams might not feel the same way.

If, however, you're wondering what the officialposition might be, we actually talked to For Honorcreative director Jason VandenBerghe about this very topic. And as it turns out, the potential for 2v2 matches to become unbalanced is his favorite thing about the mode.

"It has these wonderful moments because somebody dies first, right?" He chuckled, adding, "And then it's 2v1. And then, with any luck, it's 1v1."

VandenBerghe is into the idea of fallen teammates shouting and cheering while they're sitting on the sidelines, watching a fight they no longer have any active stake in. He also contends that those 2v1 scenarios aren't as unbalanced as they might seem.

"If your buddy goes down, the environment gets really important, really fast," he said, referring to For Honor's spike traps and unprotected ledges. It's very easy -- as Kotaku has already pointed out -- to toss opponents off the map for a quick win.

Even without the environmental hazards, VandenBerghe believes that 2v2 matches have a way of balancing themselves out naturally.

"In every game there's usually a moment where someone's got to manage an outnumbered situation," he said. "If you're the one and your buddy fell, ideally they fell with [their opponent] having 10 percent health left. So if you could just hit him once it'll be back to 1v1. It's a lot of fun."

Featured Video For You
Nintendo has reinvented the party game

Topics Esports Gaming Ubisoft

Previous：Is it 'Thunderbolts*' or *The New Avengers'?

Next：Skates in the deep sea may incubate eggs near 'black smoker' vents

Related Articles
Related Recommendations
Categories
Latest Articles
Popular Articles
Hot Recommendations
Featured Column

Quick Links

Robert Pinsky is SeventyThe Morning News Roundup for October 20, 2014The Morning News Roundup for October 21, 2014The Reference Books of Our YouthToo Much of a Good ThingThe Morning News Roundup for October 24, 2014The Morning News Roundup for Thursday, October 23, 2014Tonight: Prurience! by Dan PiepenbringGrief and Adventure on the Path to the North PoleGlobalization in GermanyEven the Swedish Academy is FallibleInside the Offices of Therapists and AnalystsThe Morning News Roundup for October 28, 2014Two Paintings About the Temptation of Saint HilarionA Letter from e.e. cummings to Ezra PoundThis Week on the Daily by Dan PiepenbringDylan Thomas’s Favorite RestaurantThe Rise of a Salsa Empire and the Decline of BoogalooThe Morning News Roundup for Thursday, October 23, 2014The Literary Agent of Yore Economic Blackout on Feb. 28: Explaining the social media NYT Strands hints, answers for March 2 Stuff Your Kindle Day: How to get free cozy fantasy books on Feb. 28 Best gaming laptop deal: Save $300 on ASUS ROG Strix G16 Stuff Your Kindle Day: How to get free coming Acer Aspire Vero 16: $320 off at Best Buy Stuff Your Kindle Day: How to get free books on Feb. 28 NYT mini crossword answers for February 28, 2025 TikTok's latest trend mocks millennial burger joints NASA's Webb telescope threatened with budget cuts. They would hit hard. Best Google deal: Save $150 on the Google Pixel 9 Meta admits Instagram Reels featured violence, porn in graphic error NYT mini crossword answers for March 1, 2025 iRobot Roomba Q011 deal: $149.99 at Amazon Best coffee machine deal: Save $60 on the Nespresso Vertuo Plus MotoGP 2025 livestream: Watch Thailand Grand Prix for free 'Severance' Reddit theory may have answered the 'Cold Harbor' mystery 'Twilight' Lego set hands Razer Kishi V2 deal: Snag one for 50% off NYT Strands hints, answers for February 27

1.4148s , 10194.0234375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【batille eroticism】,Pursuit Information Network  

Sitemap

Top

Quick Links